Tim Russert, RIP – please

My gosh, has it already been a year since Tim Russert, NBC commentator and Meet the Press host, died suddenly of a heart attack? Tim, we hardly missed ye.


I remember that after Russert’s untimely death at the age of 58, NBC (and indeed the entire TV news establishment) spent three or four days discussing his life and impact on politics in a gusher of praise that hadn’t been matched since at least the death of Ronald Reagan. To hear the talk among the chattering heads, you would have thought that Jesus had been crucified and taken to the tomb.

My view of Russert was a little more nuanced. To me, he always came across as a leering, pumpkin-headed sycophant who sucked up shamelessly to whichever party was in power so he could retain his precious “access” to Washington bigwigs. Whatever journalistic and political smarts he had were always secondary to his desire to lick the boots of the powers that be. As for his appreciation of journalistic ethics, I’ll note that Russert commented for months on the Valerie Plame scandal without ever disclosing to his viewers that he was a key witness who had been questioned as part of that investigation.

In short, Russert exemplified everything rotten and corrupt about the current media establishment that’s trying desperately to hang on to its influence inside the Beltway.

I certainly don’t wish for the premature death of anyone and I’m sorry that Russert’s wife and son lost someone who was very important to them. But I’m also glad I was spared the ordeal of having to watch his smirking visage during last fall’s presidential campaign.


Posted

in

by

Comments

4 responses to “Tim Russert, RIP – please”

  1. forward thinker Avatar
    forward thinker

    Tom, I agree with you completely. Well said.

  2. innerredneckexposed Avatar
    innerredneckexposed

    I’m going to have to disagree with you on this Tom. Tim was only concerned about trapping his guests on MTP. Period. He was damn good at it and he could tell when a subject was on the ropes. I still believe he was one of the key reason Howard Dean was never able to win the Democratic nomination when Dean went on MTP and Tim got him to admit he had no idea how many troops were in Iraq and Afghanistan.

  3. J.M. Prince Avatar
    J.M. Prince

    Yep. Thanks for the reminder Tom. That was much of my immediate take on him. And one of the reasons why I stopped watching. That & all the other cable ‘bloviators’. I’m sorry, but after decades of watching this dreck? It’s just gotten worse. Far worse than anyone ever imagined. They’re really ought to be term limits on pundits, especially Washington/Beltway ones. I’m past sick and tired of watching the same old (mostly Lilly white too) men tell the rest of us how, when & why to think. Hence the rise of Blogs & serious amateurs who actually take their news & independently sourced information far more seriously than most of the networks do presently. They actually Do fact checking, despite more limited resources. And the best of them? Are also ‘self correcting’. (Try that for either the MTP or even the NYT or especially the WSJ Op-Ed page). It’s mostly a waste of time watching now. You’re as likely to be seriously misinformed due to someone’s not so hidden agenda (Thanks Rupert!) as not. And that gets old fast.

    So it’s back to the future. Instead of the mega salaried ‘super-stars’ who like Charlie Gibson imagine that a ~250K household income is ‘middle class (in one of the Prez. debates), we have an entire new generation of inspired & passionate citizen journos that would not have been out of place in earlier days. They had super-stars way back then too. None were regularly paid as obscenely as we do for our ‘news readers’ today. They now imagine that they’re part of the ruling elite. And that’s the start of their problems. No matter how many books they might write ‘poor mouthing’ their humble origins like ‘Big Tim’. Geesh. We need fewer like him & more like Ernie Pyle. But where do you start? And they’re not hiring such today either. JMP

  4. Zaid Avatar
    Zaid

    My view of Russert was a little more nuanced. To me, he always came across as a leering, pumpkin-headed sycophant who sucked up shamelessly to whichever party was in power so he could retain his precious “access” to Washington bigwig”

    Well-said

    My words from a couple years ago (he wasn’t dead yet I’m not cruel :P)

    http://www.standupuga.org/content/how-fourth-estate-killed-my-democracy

    “Near the end of debate, Tim Russert decides that Ohio Congressman Denis Kucinich, who has a record of opposing every asinine adventure the Bush Administration has embarked on, which you think would earn him some speaking time, actually gets to answer a question posed directly to him.

    Kucinich, who graduated from Case Western Reserve University with a Master’s degree in Speech Communications and has been known to hold his own in debates, straightens up, relieved to finally be able to talk at length.

    “This is a serious question,” deadpans Russert.

    Kucinich’s mind is probably racing, wondering what he’ll be asked about. His Cheney impeachment resolution? His single-payer universal healthcare bill? His opposition to NAFTA and the WTO? His plan to get out of Iraq?

    Russert continues, “The godmother of your daughter, Shirley MacLaine, writes in her new book that you sighted a UFO over her home in Washington state…”

    If I’ve ever wanted to jump into television-land and kick someone’s butt, that was the moment. I know I’m a small guy, but bloated Tim Russert, jetting from pundit to pollster in his private limousine (shameless self-promoting autobiography no one really wants to read in hand), probably hasn’t been in a fight with anything other than a Junior Whopper in decades. I could take him.

    Granted, Russert does know a thing or two about serious questions. On the eve of the war against Iraq, Vice President Cheney offered one interview to the press. He chose ol’ Timmy at MSNBC. Here’s how that exclusive interview climaxed:

    MR. RUSSERT: How’s your health?

    VICE PRES. CHENEY: Good. No complaints.

    MR. RUSSERT: How’s your diet?

    VICE PRES. CHENEY: My diet is good. I’m watched over very carefully by my wife and by doctors and I’ve got…

    MR. RUSSERT: Do you prefer French fries or freedom fries?

    VICE PRES. CHENEY: I don’t eat them whatever they’re called. I used to love them, but, no, I stay away from French fries. They’re not on my diet.

    But I can’t blame Russert alone for his morbid flirtation with a man about to launch an illegal war that, so far, has cost the human lives of over a million Iraqis and thousands of American soldiers. The entire American corporate media apparatus was involved in polishing the Administration’s boots so it could stomp all over the world in its messianic crusade. Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting, a media watchdog group, found that in the two weeks leading to Colin Powell’s speech at the United Nations in 2003 making the case for attacking Iraq, CBS, NBC, ABC and PBS aired pro-war and anti-war interviews in a ratio of nearly 400:3. I think there was more dissidence in the Soviet Union’s Pravda.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *